Cory Booker – Cory Booker’s claim about regulations on toy guns and not firearms misses the point

Democratic presidential candidate Cory Booker wants more regulations on guns, an industry he said is even less regulated than their toy imitations.

Booker, a U.S. senator from New Jersey, laid out his plan for tougher gun control on Medium on May 6.

In his multi-pronged plan, Booker made a case for more oversight of gun manufacturers. “Nowadays, there is more regulation over toy guns than real ones,” he wrote.

Booker repeated this talking point in a CNN interview, saying that firearms are currently exempt from oversight from the Consumer Product Safety Commission: “We have different regulations for toy guns and no regulations for weapons on our streets that are killing so many people.”

Are there more regulations on the actual weapons than on their toy replicas? We decided to look at the regulations for both.

We found Booker’s statement misleading. He oversimplified regulations to manufacturing standards only, while regulations on guns, real ones or imitations, don’t stop at that stage.

Regulations over toy guns focus on product designs

Toy guns and real guns are regulated very differently, said Timothy Lytton, law professor at Georgia State University.

Booker was on point citing federal consumer safety standards for toy guns and a lack thereof for firearms, which were exempted from Consumer Product Safety Commission oversight under a 1972 law.

Toy guns must abide by general mandatory safety standards set by the commission for all toys, including labeling, preventing choking hazards and toxic substance testing. On top of that, toy gun manufacturers also need to meet federal requirements, so as to prevent the toys from being mixed up with lethal lookalikes.

Toy guns need to either display a predominant color chosen from an approved list, or a blaze orange plug or a blaze orange band around the muzzle.

Non-powder guns, including air, pellet and BB guns, are separate from toy guns. They are subject to general rules by the commission, which hasn’t adopted specific mandatory design standards.

Booker has a point that unlike most consumer products, these federal consumer product safety standards are lacking for real firearms. No federal law in place regulates the safety design standards for firearms, and the commission also cannot recall defective firearms.

Manufacturers can follow voluntary standards set by the Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers’ Institute on a voluntary basis. Those standards are not incorporated into U.S. federal law.

But all of this doesn’t mean that firearms are unregulated.

Seven states and the District of Columbia have set their own rules about safety standards and design related to firearms, for example, drop testing to ensure a gun doesn’t misfire when it is dropped.

When it comes to defects of products, both toy guns and real guns manufacturers are subject to tort liabilities, said Eugene Volokh, law professor at the University of California at Los Angeles. That means people can sue manufacturers if they are injured by defective products.

Regulations on sales and distribution of firearms

But the debate about gun policy today is hardly about defective products, Volokh said. Instead, the issue is criminal misuse, suicide as well as accidental shootings.

The laws aimed at preventing harm, regulating sales and the distribution of firearms are much more extensive than for toy guns.

“It’s just wrong to say that there is more regulation over toy guns than real ones,” said Volokh.

Booker’s comparison leaves out laws for the distribution and sales of firearms and failed to mention the various legislations at the federal, state and local level.

Federal laws have imposed restrictions on firearms licensing and ownership including background checks, banning certain types of guns (mostly assault weapons), and barring certain people from purchasing guns.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is the primary agency to enforce federal firearm laws, including the Gun Control Act, the National Firearms Act, and the Arms Export Control Act. They generally cover rules about importation of firearms, provisions regarding people banned from acquiring guns, taxing duties, etc.

State laws have more detailed regulations concerning a range of topics including concealed carrying of firearms, owners’ responsibilities, and dealer regulations.

Such restrictions generally don’t apply to toy guns.

Alan Kaufman, the senior vice president of technical affairs at The Toy Association, told PolitiFact in an email, “We are not aware of any restrictions on sale, distribution, or ownership of toy guns which comply with 15CFR 272,” referencing the federal product safety requirements.

One other key difference about toy and real gun regulations: federal funding for research. The Centers for Disease Control was explicitly barred from funding research to promote gun control due to the Dickey amendment. Only until recently a spending bill approved research on the cause of gun violence after the Parkland, Fla., school shooting, but no such restriction on public funding for research exists for toy guns.

“We spend a lot more government money on research in toy safety than we do government money in gun safety,” said Lytton. “And that’s probably a more useful comparison.”

Our ruling

Booker said, “Nowadays, there is more regulation over toy guns than real ones.”

His claim only factors in consumer safety standards and discounted a volume of federal, state and local laws and rules regulating the sales and distribution of firearms, which are more restrictive than and outnumber those regulating toy guns.

Since Booker’s claim mischaracterized the scope of regulations for toy guns and firearms, and overlooked a body of key legislations, we rate this claim Mostly False.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2019/may/10/cory-booker/cory-bookers-claim-about-no-regulations-firearms-m/